nzaa home > site recording scheme > upgrade project
|
Project participants area
|
| NZAA would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Eagle Technology in its development of the database side of this project. |
Ms R.
Darmody
New
Zealand Historic Places Trust
PO Box 13339
Tauranga Central
TAURANGA 3141
Phone
(phone (07) 578-1229
Fax
(07) 578-1141
Mobile
025 292-1588
Email
rdarmody@historic.org.nz
|
THE NZAA
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORDING SCHEME UPGRADE PROJECT The upgrade project ran from 1998 to 2007. It is now in a wind-down stage consolidating the data. No new surveying projects are being taken on. The information below is for historical purposes. Background The
New Zealand Archaeological Association (NZAA) was established in 1954 with the
objectives being to promote and foster research into the prehistory and
archaeology of New Zealand, and to press for archaeological site protection.
It is a non-statutory body representing professional and amateur
archaeologists throughout the country. The
NZAA Site Recording Scheme (SRS) was established in 1957 to encourage the
recording of information about archaeological sites. It is a paper-based record system which may contain plans,
section drawings, photographs, artefact drawings and field notes.
It is organised on a district basis, with each of the 20 district files
managed by a volunteer filekeeper. A
duplicate set of each file is housed in Wellington in a collective Central File,
managed by the Central Filekeeper. The
Department of Conservation owns and maintains the Central Index of New Zealand
Archaeological Sites (CINZAS). This
index was derived from the SRS. The
Site Recording Scheme is endorsed by the New Zealand Historic Places Trust and
the Department of Conservation as the national system for recording
archaeological site information, and was
described in a review (1996) by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the
Environment as “a database of major national significance”. The
NZ Historic Places Trust, Department of Conservation and NZAA have a written
agreement relating to the Organisation and Operation of The NZAA Site Recording
Scheme. The Central File currently
contains over 59,000 records. Records
have been contributed by many different individuals and agencies over many years
and so vary in quality and in the level of detail offered. The
SRS was established as a special interest database, and its primary use for many
years was as a research tool for members of NZAA.
Since the advent of the Resource
Management Act 1991 (the RMA) and the revised Historic Places Act 1993 (the HPA) there has been greater use of the
Scheme in planning and legal issues for site identification, protection and
management. Territorial local
authorities are one of the principle users of the Scheme in their ongoing land
and heritage management and protection roles. It
is essential, if we are to ensure the long-term survival of our archaeological
heritage, that the information within the SRS is accurate and up to date.
The NZAA is committed to advocating for archaeological site protection,
and the SRS is a vital part of this objective.
Accuracy is also required for effective use of the database as a research
tool. As the owners of the Scheme, therefore, the NZAA believes
that it has a responsibility to provide accurate information, within reasonable
limits. The
Upgrade Project The
data fields of most urgency to be checked were: grid reference, site location,
condition, threats and land ownership status.
It should be stated, however, that not all the sites needed to be visited
in order to determine if the information available about the site was adequate.
During
the first five years of the project funding assistance was received from the
Lottery Grants Board, through the Lottery Environment and Heritage Committee.
From July 2004 the Ministry for Culture & Heritage provided funding
for the national project administration, electronic database development and Iwi
participation for a period of three years.
Local
Authority Involvement Since
the advent of the RMA and the revised HPA there has been greater use of the
Scheme in planning and legal issues for site identification, protection and
management. Local authorities are
one of the principle users of the Scheme in their land and heritage management
and protection roles. The 2003
amendment of the RMA (section 6(f)) elevated historic heritage to a matter of
national importance and requires local authorities to
“recognise and provide for [historic heritage]…”, rather than to
“…have particular regard to…” as previously required under section 7(e).
The definition of historic heritage includes archaeological sites and it is
anticipated that the SRS will become even more important as a source of
information to local authorities and land owners. Section
35 of the RMA 1991 requires local authorities to "gather such information,
and undertake or commission such research, as is necessary to carry out
effectively its functions". The
NZAA Council considers the SRS Upgrade Project to fall within that definition. The
Upgrade Project commenced in the Gisborne district in June 1999.
Project work has been undertaken in every region of New Zealand.
Project fieldwork was made possible by funding assistance from each of
the participating local authorities. Forty-five
local authority districts have participated in the Upgrade Project and have
upgraded archaeological site record information. A number of
local authorities throughout New Zealand decided not to participate in the
project. The accuracy of
archaeological site data in these districts, therefore, has not been verified by
a recent field visit. Iwi/hapu
Involvement A
number of Iwi/hapu have established their own environmental and cultural
heritage databases so they can have greater input to resource management issues
within their rohe. In most cases
they have obtained the base data about archaeological sites, some of which may
also be wahi tapu, from the SRS. This
data is usually provided free of charge, either as paper records from the
relevant district file, or by the Department of Conservation as an electronic
download of relevant CINZAS data. The
NZAA encouraged active Iwi/hapu participation in the Upgrade Project. We were,
however, be guided by each Iwi/hapu regarding their level of involvement in the
project. In some areas this
extended to having an Iwi/hapu representative accompany the archaeologist during
fieldwork. Iwi/hapu representatives
were selected by the participating Iwi/hapu, and were usually people with a
particular interest in cultural heritage management and conservation. The
NZAA acknowledges that archaeological sites are only one aspect of cultural
heritage. The Upgrade Project was
not intended to replace a comprehensive assessment of cultural heritage places.
Archaeologists are trained to recognise and interpret archaeological
information and are able to provide expert advice about the interpretation and
management of archaeological sites. Landowner
Involvement The
majority of the recorded archaeological sites are located on privately owned
land. The success of the project
was, therefore, dependant upon access being granted by property owners.
All landowners with recorded archaeological sites on their properties,
that are to be included in the project fieldwork, were contacted in writing and
a request for their written consent to allow the field crew to visit their
property was sought. The NZAA
respected and abided by any restrictions on access imposed by landowners.
The field inspections were undertaken on foot and no ground disturbance
occurred. If landowners declined
property access, the information contained in the SRS about sites on their
property was unable to be checked and updated. Beyond
the Upgrade Project The
NZAA recently received funding from the Community Partnership Fund administered
by the Department of Internal Affairs in order to carry out a project to
digitize the information contained within the NZAA Site Recording Scheme.
The intention is to commission and build a digital Site Recording Scheme
over the next three years. This
scheme will incorporate the information gathered during the NZAA Upgrade
Project. |